Women and Environment

That the relationship amid people and the environs is non gender-neutral became realise in the mid-eighties. Some organizations, focusing on the day-to-day lives of communities, argued that the position and concerns of wo workforce were imperceptible in environmental debates and programmers. The union for Science and Environment (CSE base in New Delhi, India, in their The State of Indias Environment Report or the Second Citizens Report of 1984-1985 argued that Probably no other group is much than affected by environmental destruction than poor vill jump on women.E rattling diffuse brings with it a long march in search of fuel, fodderand water. It does non well-disposed function if the women argon old, young or pregnant crucial house command necessitate stupefy to be met day after weary day. As ecologic conditions worsen, the long march stupefys nevertheless longer and much tiresome. Caught amidst p overty and environmental destruction, poor rural women in India could well be arriver the limits of physical endurance. (CSE 1985) In that same year of 1985, the second UN Decade for Women convention was held in Nairobi, Kenya.The Environment Liaison Centre (presently the Environment Liaison Centre International or ELCI) organized a series of workshops on women, environment and development at the NGO Forum. These workshops were aimed at developing a rest period under put forwarding of the relationship between women and the physical environment. More than 25 women leaders from all parts of the reality with an audience of women and men gayy clock to a greater extent than(prenominal) presented their local and regional case studies on women and the global environmental crisis, as well as on women and forests, energy, agriculture, and water management at local place aim. unmatched of the main conclusions from the workshops was that women bear the highest costs of the environmental crisis because of their roles in providing water, alime nt and energy at family and community levels. On the other hand, it was shown that women could potentially in any case ferment a large contribution to the solution of the crisis, precisely collectible to their role in the management of those primary resources. The increase in womens post and the sustainability of development be ecologically tied.It is therefore imperative that women be enabled to participate and be involved at all levels of development think through come out the industrialized and developing worlds, according to the ELC statement to the UN Womens league in 1985. Fe priapic Participation in the Labor Force over the last century, the issue of women in the work smudge has been a tumultuous hotshot. onwardhand(predicate) in the twentieth century, few women participated in the repel thrust. A cleaning ladys place was at home, fetching trouble of the family and managing the domestic world.It was resonaten as unfit for women to be in certain professions, and most women did non work, other than going intimately their daily chores around the house. The Great Depression magnified this feature, as unemployment reached its highest levels in history but women, more than ever, stayed home to cipher after their husbands who outright show themselves without work. World contend II brought a complete backsliding to this course. Productivity boomed and the men left their homes, some to work, most to join the war effort.Women, in large masses for the showtime judgment of conviction, also hit the push back market. Dubbed Rosie the Riveter, these women worked at manufacturing plants and at other technological industries that had previously seen plainly manly employees. With the men finish off at war, these companies needed women to fill their shoes, and women streamed into the business. Since then, they pick out non fancyed back, as women employment in the wear out posture grew level in the four decades after World War II. It was non until very upstartly that young-bearing(prenominal) employment growth evaluate have leveled out.I forecast to explain why this has happened, as well as examining different sectors of the miserliness and comparing women employment and men employment. Just after World War II the civilian tug force participation for women was a moving 32%. Today, however, some six decades later that rate has climbed in unornamented of 70%. For four solid decades after the war, this rate increased at an astounding rate. Early in the 1990s, however, this rate leveled off. This brought s gayly much guesswork as to whether or non women were thus starting to leave the wear force and, if so, what the causes of that might be.In ready to look at this hypothesis more closely, we first need to break down the women in the apprehend force by age 16-24 year olds, 25-34 year olds, 35-44 year olds, 45-54 year olds, and 55+ eld. In the mid 1940s, 35-44 year olds were engaged in the labor forc e more than any other age group. In the late 1980s and into the early 1990s, this was noneffervescent the case. Over the last 25 years, however, the younger age groups have exploded onto the work scene, drastically shooting up from a fortune (of women that age in the labor force) of 40 per centum in 1970 to almost 75 per centum in the early 1990s.Until the 1970s, a represent of effeminate participation rates in the labor force would look like an M, with a large dip coming between the early 20s until the later-child bearing years, the mid 30s. However, with all age groups this instant actively participating in the labor force, that graph straightaway looks like an top of the inning down U. In the early 1990s participation rates of women abruptly flattened out. Initially much thought was given to the fact that more mothers were exiting the labor force temporarily in order to look after their children or become homemakers. so analysts turned to specific age groups. They found that there was a signifi cleart drop off in labor force participation rates of women ages 16-24. Historically, rates of this age group did sustain business cycles, so why the sudden form? The explanation was that more pi assuageates that age were enrolling in schools. School enrollment between 1987 and 1993 increased nearly 28 per centum, and women in school were less likely to be active in the labor force. Other age groups continued their slightly upward(a) trend, with the entirely exception being the 16-24 year olds.One explanation as to why these women decided to attend school quite an than remain in the labor force is the recession of the early 1990s. There was a recessionary duty market, so the younger, less stable women chose to go back to school rather than seek alternate employment. Since the early 1990s, however, the growth of women entering the labor force has resumed. The makeup of the group of women in the labor force has been influenced more recently than ever before on family structure. In the last ten years, mothers have accounted for most of the rise in womens overall labor force rate.For mothers with children between the ages of 6 and 17, an astonishing 77 percent are in the labor force. With children under 6, this percentage understandably dips to 62 points, but both largely higher(prenominal) than a decade ago. For mothers with infants less than a year old, the percentage entering the labor force has grown nearly 20 percent over the last decade. This trend is a strong reflection of todays social norms working for pay is an integral part of some(prenominal) womens lives, as remote to early in the 20th century when housework was the norm.The 1996 Wel furtheste tame Bill passed by Congress had an kernel on poor and unity mothers in the workplace. By trying to move women from welfare to work, the bill boost these women to find lines, thus entering the labor force. Additionally, the real wages of met passing dispirit incomes ha s remained stagnant or even slightly fallen in recent years. The cost of a wife sitting around the house and taking care of the children has risen, so the wives have much more incentive, and need, now to go out and earn on their own. This, in turn, also puts pressure on champion mothers to go out and work as well.These women do non necessarily work full- sentence year-round, but their entrance into the marketplace is a official for non save(prenominal) them but the womens grounds in general. It has gotten to the point, however, that spousals and children (except a pre-school aged child, where mothers tend to stay at home or work minimal hours) now have elflike effect on whether a not a muliebrity works, and for how long she works. This is the societal norm, although annoy to other income (e. g. husbands earnings, single vs. married woman) take over has a large effect on a womans employment options.Women now spend a straddle of hours more in the workplace per day than th ey do caring for their children as opposed to 20 years ago, yet many mothers are still not committed to full-time year-round employment. Throughout the entire 20th century, womens wages have constantly lagged behind mens wages. If a woman and mad were both hired to do the same task, the man would be paid more than the women. That has been and continues to be the trend in the Ameri toilet capitalist state. One explanation has always been that the men are not only more qualified at the notes but more efficient.Thus, the argument goes, they should be paid at a higher premium. Today, however, the wage gap is still existent, and very few would find that argument valid. So why do women still earn less than men, and why are women lots discriminated against in the workplace? When a child enters a family, it is the woman who, much more often than not, stays at home and cares for the new baby. When the women exits the labor force, she does not gain the seniority that she would have otherwi se gotten had there been no child.When women harvest-festival to the labor force, they are less likely to gull on the job training, and thus less like to increase their productivity and thus level of pay. The absence from the work force, even if only for several months to take care of a newborn child, can depreciate the job skills of women, so when they publication back to work they are not as sharp and take some time to regain pre-birth efficiency in the business leader. Knowing this, employers are less likely to hire women who are in their prime years for giving birth. This also stands for women applying for new jobs if they left the labor force nce before for a child, chances are good that they might do it again. An employer willing see this and thus shy away from hiring the woman, instead perhaps deferring to a man who would remain at work. Employers may even view those who do not take time away from work as more commit than women who do, regardless of the reason, and this could be reflected in reduced promotion possibilities, different job assignments, and other actions that could have salary implications. This is certainly not fair to women it is not their fault that they are biologically the ones who give birth and must often clock look after the children.Regardless, the trend is that those women who do take time off from work often are overlooked for more competitive jobs and receive less pay. I have just established that women are now in the labor force more than ever before. But now that they are working, what kinds of jobs are they doing? In private industry, the breakdown of women compared to men is interesting. In 2000 there were 44 million workers in private industry in the United States, 23. 5 million of which were male, 20. 5 million effeminate. A more specific breakdown, however, shows some astounding differences.There were twice as many male officials and managers than there were females (3 million as opposed to 1. 5 million). Officia ls and managers are describe as occupations requiring administrative and managerial personnel who set broad policies, compute overall responsibility for execution of these policies, etc. Yet the number of workers delineate as professionals gives females the numeric advantage, 3. 6 million to 3. 4 million. Professionals are describe as occupations requiring either college graduation or experience of such kind. Thus even though the women labor force tends to be slightly more educated than the male labor force, it is the males who, by a 21 balance, are in managerial and authoritative positions In other generic nationals, there is also a stark contrast between males and females. Women amount men by roughly a 32 ratio in sales, and for office and clerical workers in private industry in the United States in 2000, there were over 5 million females and only slightly over 1 million males. This is no doubt a emboss, the female secretary or clerical workers, but according to these sta tistics this stereotype seems to get to true.What reasons are there that so many more females are attracted to, or rather hold, secretarial jobs? There are many. On the bemuse side, however, there were six times as many male craftsmanship workers ( clever labor) than there were female craft workers in 2000. Perhaps females are not attracted to the demanding physical labor of such jobs, much the way males do not like clerical tasks. Historically, males have been overwhelmingly predominant in the empyrean of physical labor. When some women were forced to work in factories for personal pecuniary reasons, they were often despised and treated unequally.This, I am sure, led many females to be extremely not attracted to such professions. Likewise, females have always dominant as office secretaries and the like. Back when women first entered the labor force, these were often the only types of jobs available so they took them. Today, women still flock to these clerical jobs. Looking at more specific job palm, these same general observations seem to hold true. In the field of engineering and management services, male office officials and managers greatly outweigh female managers.There are more than twice as many male technicians as female technicians, and over 12 times as many male skilled laborers than female skilled laborers. However, the number of female clerical workers is more than four times that of male clerical workers. dismantle male operatives (semiskilled workers) outnumber by three times the number of female operatives. These numbers pool show overwhelmingly that the technical aspect of engineering is enjoyed more by males, while the women are still confined to the office. In the field of legal services, females outnumber males by a 1. 71 ration.Nearly devil thirds of all females in this profession, however, are in fact office and clerical workers. Male professionals outnumber female professionals by a wide margin, and the trend shown in the genera l population holds true here, too. In the field of computers and office equipment, twice as many males as females hold jobs in this area. As usual, the number of female clerical workers greatly outweighs the number of male clerical workers. It comes as no surprise that, in the field of computers, male professionals, technicians, and skilled laborers greatly outweighs the number of female workers in these areas.The same trends can be seen in other areas such as communications. One profession bucking this trend, however, can be found in hospitals. Women hospital employees outnumber male hospital employees by more than a 31 margin. Additionally, the number of female officials and managers, professionals, and technicians outweigh the numbers for the males, not just in raw numbers but also in terms of percentages. Males, however, still comprise the bulky majority of skilled laborers in this area. It is nice to see, however, an area that goes against the general trend.Even though women seem to be dominant in a few field of work and very scattered throughout many others, this is a change from a couple generations ago when most women were not even in the labor force. For women, this fact is definitely a step in the positive direction. Most women now hold jobs in the workplace, and are sustaining them for longer amounts of time than ever before. The next step is for women to immerse themselves in all fields of the labor force, rather than just concentrating on a selective few.This brings responsibility to males, too, to allow for women to reach the upper echelons of the labor force. In a labor force that has been historically dominated by males, this proves to be an intriguing mooring over the next decade as more and more women be after to the officials and managers that they are not today. Womens tuition from past till now amicable Relevance pedagogy has been the stumbling block keeping women from attaining equal position in society, separating them from their male counterparts. It has also been the door to this elusive dream of equality.Before women gained the right and exclusive right of higher education they were believed to be lower-class citizens, not worthy of voter turnout or owning property, or any number of other inalienable rights. It was not only men who believed that women should hold a lower position than they. queen Victoria said I am most anxious to muster in everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, unredeemable folly of Womens Rights, with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble get off is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping.Were woman to unsex themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection. (Victorian Station)Without education to empower them, many women believed that they should not hold the power to inf luence politics or even make decisions about their own property. Women were stripped of their dignity and privileges by men of the community and even by their own husbands. However, they were finally able to break free from these social constraints through education. It is telling that most of he early feminists were set asunder from their complacent sisters by education. They were educated, and through this knowledge gained a sense of self-worth and the power to change history. Higher education is the foundation of the empowered women of today. The struggle for womens education has been an uphill battle that has not yet reached its citadel. This journey took sink in the Victorian period and branched even to modern times. During the mid-eighteen hundreds women were evaluate to live up to a feminine ideal. This ideology required women to be pure, pious, domestic and submissive (Eisenmann Apendix).None of these ideals would be achieved through education. In fact, receiving an educa tion in the Victorian Period was considered an act of nonconformity(Solomon xviii). A woman could not fill her preordained place in society if she wasting her time gaining knowledge. Education was thought to make women discontented with their current status, and possibly even pissed off with men (McClelland 12). Education for women was thought to disrupt the social balance of the time. On the contrary, the earliest push for Victorian women to become educated was because they were mothers of men and lastly teachers of men (Solomon xviii).It was not until the twentieth century that women began to desire knowledge for themselves as individuals. History of Women in Education In order to understand the womens education political campaign, it is important to have a brief background of its history. During the time of the ideal subservient woman a few bold women and events stand out as milestones in history. The first is in 1833 Oberlin College was founded. It was the nations first univer sity to need women and black students. The next important event was the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848. This convention added fuel to the flame of education and suffrage.The Seneca Falls solving has been called the single most important document of the nineteenth-century American womans movement. At the convention a declaration concerning womens rights was adopted modeling the Declaration of Independence. Appearing in addition to issues of suffrage were issues of education and employment. The Declaration of Sentiments states He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scrimpy remuneration. He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers ost honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known. He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education all colleges being closed against her. (Schneir 77) This event is of utmost im portance to the womens rights movement. It laid the foundation for future achievements even though suffrage was not achieved until 1920. After the Seneca Falls Convention women continued to achieve milestones in education. In 1877, Helen Magill became the first woman in the United States to earn her Ph. D.By 1880, women comprised eighty percent of all elementary school educators, and by 1910 women made up 39 percent of all collegiate undergraduate students and even 20 percent of all college faculty. Finally, in 1920 womens suffrage was achieved, giving women a watertight foothold in society. In 1945, the first woman was accepted to Harvard medical exam School, and by 1972 Title XI was passed to help end the discrimination based on sex for any educational program that receive federal official funding. In 1980 women equaled men in numbers enrolled in colleges with 51 percent.Finally, in 1996 Virginia Military Institute was forced by the Supreme Court to become coeducational (Eisenm ann appendix). There are many other events along the caterpillar tread to education that helped women achieve the status they enjoy today. This brief chronology merely traces a few of the hundreds of thousands of victories women had to win in order to become educated. Reasons for Oppression One of the main values that necessitated all of this arduous labor in order to simply become educated was that, people feared that the social system would break down if women were allowed to be educated.They worried that women would cease to fulfill their traditional roles if they received a higher education. It was even thought that a woman risked virtuoso fever or sterility if she became educated (Delamont 109). These Victorian ideas seem false from a twentieth century perspective, but educated women today still have to deal with a certain measure of social stigma. It is often overlooked, however, because it has been adapted to fit the social constraints of today. They are forced at times to choose to live up to the dreams of their education or to live up to the societal implications of being a mother and wife (Solomon xix).This is only one of many reasons that the fight for adequate womans education is far from over. University of Texas Compared to Cambridge The fact that the need for reform in womens education is not over is illustrated in two parallel cases. During the early feminist movement and the beginnings of the reform of womens education, the best case to study is Cambridge in England. At the time this university had established authority in academia there was not a comparable university in the United States.Therefore, it is unavoidable to compare universities crossways the boundaries of nations. Women first gained notoriety at Cambridge when in the 1860s Emily Davies was successful in her campaign to allow women to attend Cambridge University. However, they did not have the same status as the male students there (Acker 51). Even though Cambridge was one of the first universities to encourage women to study they did not award women the same degrees as men upon completion of the same tests (Vicinus 117). This is a testament to the slow but steady progress of women in education.These women were dedicated and willing to study despite sub-par pay upon completion of school. It was not until 1947 that women were admitted to Cambridge as equal members (Acker 51). While it was a bright start for women in the Victorian period to even be allowed to study, it is necessary to evaluate the staggering length of time this progress took to occur. It took almost a century for women to gain the same recognition as men. In light of these facts, it is dangerous to assume that women today have equal educational opportunity.As little as fifty-five years ago women were celebrating the fact that they could finally earn a degree at Cambridge University. That is not a very removed past. When asked if women at The University of Texas still face issues of edu cational bias, the answer is an unequivocal yes. Women make up almost half of the undergraduate student population at forty-nine percent. Sadly, these women are outnumbered in fields that have traditionally been male-dominated such as architecture and medicine. However, the average grade point average of women is higher than men in every field of study(Office of Inst. . This makes it clear that it is not a discrepancy of ability that keeps women from pursuing these vocations.There must be some sort out of lingering Victorian attitudes that keep women from living up to their potential. Women today train to more diverse areas of study and vocation. However, they are realistic about what the world has in store for them and therefore gravitate towards more typically female professions (Kramarae 489). Another important fact is that the percentage of women faculty is a insufficient 33 percent (Office of Inst. Research has found that students tend to seek out classrooms and vocations in which they will feel comfortable and successful. Some students report avoiding courses that are overwhelmingly male because of the unwelcome feeling they experience in the classroom. How can women feel comfortable pursuing any field of study when male mentors and educators surround them and when the only contributions taught are those of males (Kramarae 498)? The battle for womens education will not be won until women feel free and comfortable to observe any academic field.