'King Lear – Existentialism Essay\r'

'The term existentiality was used in the realise of philosophers in the 1800s and the 1900s. The concept holds that people should focus on dealing with the present conditions of individual persons while ta business leader into account the individuals’ emotions, responsibilities, actions, and thoughts. This concept is reflected in Shakespe be’s power Lear play. For, example, King Lear k directlys that it is his responsibility to as percent his res publica among his three daughters. He hitherto decides to divide his earth to his daughters according to how the daughters supposedly love him.\r\nHe and then disinherits Cordelia because of her genuineness which does non please him. Instead, he sh ares his kingdom to his other ii daughters since Cordelia speaks to him bluntly. Even though Cordelia’s statement is temperate and honest, it makes King Lear annoyed. By do this decision, King Lear demonstrates that he is non rational only is just thinking of hi mself. King Lear shows absurdism in sacramental manduction his kingdom because he should share his wealthiness equally to his three daughters. He instead decides not to share it to Cordelia even though she is one of his daughters but he thought was not pleasing to him.\r\nHe should not have ranked as one of his daughter. By being either good bad, King Lear’s daughters remain his. He should also understand that what happens to a bad person can as swell happen to a good person. This concept is unmixed later when we see his 2 daughters, who he in one case thought as special, seeing their get as foolish and old. On the other hand, Cordelia has a conclude to decide to stay alone without cooperating with her fellow sisters because of what her father did to her.\r\nHer sisters could have reasoned and told their father that it was unfair not to give Cordelia a share of his kingdom since she was their sister. Their actions however show that they are also selfish. Cordelia is in never-ending despair after her father refuses to bequeath to her a portion of his kingdom even though she is marry by the king of France later. Moreover, King Lear denies Kent facticity by direct him away from the country for being against the decision of the king to refuse to give a share to his wealth to Cordelia †his daughter.\r\nThis is despite the fact that Kent returns into the country baring a new name †Caius. King Lear’s authenticity makes him not to change his decision regarding how he has dual-lane his wealth. In addition, King Lear facticity makes him employ Caius without knowing that Caius is then Kent whom King Lear previously sent from his country. While experiencing his hold freedom as angst, King Lear discovers that his two daughters do not respect him any more for they are now powerful.\r\nMoreover, and their father at this time now does not have any power to hold them. King Lear experiences anxiety and anguish after having seen that his daug hters are ungrateful. This issue makes him to be enraged. He thus recalls the facticity that he gave to his daughters and feels very infuriated. He thus summarily denounces the daughters. At the end, King Lear is very embarrassed due to his two daughters who now do not respect him until he becomes mad. Cordelia and Kent, whom he thought as useless, are victorious care of him.\r\n'