Topic: State the main points of Marcuses critique of Sartre, and consider the intellect on which Sartre might defend himself. Could Sartre succeed? Herbert Marcuses critique of Sartre in existentialist school of thought: Remarks on Jean-Paul Sartres LEtre et le Neant is establish on the claim that Sartres manner is ontologically impure, in that its depend of the reputation of consciousness is in item abstracted from historical factors. This upbraiding was not specific to Sartre. Marcuses woo is rooted firmly in the so-called critical supposition developed in the thirties by Max Horkheimers fetch for Social Research, of which Marcuse was a constituent prior to World state of war Two. Horkheimer was concerned with providing a progressive response to what he saying as a growing recourse to antirationalist philosophies. He believed that philosophy need not give up on rationalism, merely that in do to bring it up to date, a materialist trace of its nature, condition, a nd limits must be provided. In addition, he believed in preserving a strong government note between true and false consciousness. In this vein, Marcuse takes render with Sartres account of being-for- new(prenominal)s, which is based on a flip-flopping between two modes of interaction. As beings in a social world, according to Sartre, an ingrained area of who we are has an independent existence, in the form of other peoples perceptions and opinions of us. We lavatory either seek to dominate the others consciousness or be dominated ourselves, but never both, as /* the other lav only exist for us in two forms: if I experience him with evidence, I fail to know him [and hence myself]; if I know him, if I act upon him, I only put out his being-as-object and his probable existence in the midst of the world. */ Marcuse points out that this waiver takes the same form as... If you want to get a take essay, order it on our website: OrderCustom! Paper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment